Friday, August 21, 2020

Double Standards in the Workplace Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Twofold Standards in the Workplace - Essay Example It will likewise deliver guileful endeavors to conceal or clarify away this twofold norm.  As an underlying issue, â€Å"existing national insights bolster a view that Corporate America isn't a sexual orientation adjusted playing field† (Murphy, 2001). Ladies today establish the greater part of the workforce, however they don’t even record for five percent of all business administrators. All things considered, procure just 68% of what comparatively qualified and utilized male chiefs gain. Notwithstanding these colossal differences as far as upward portability and remuneration, ladies are likewise ordinarily the casualties of lewd behavior; actually, insights demonstrate that almost 75% of ladies guarantee to have been explicitly hassled at the work environment. There is likewise a subjective twofold standard in activity. Ladies chiefs, for example, are all the more regularly troubled with non-the board managerial errands than are their male partners. To put it plainly, there is a lot of factual proof to help the suggestion that a twofold standard dependent on sex is genuine and considerable.  Some have contended, in any case, that these measurements are deluding. The National Organization for Men, to refer to a notable model, has contended that ladies have utilized this twofold standard idea as a political instrument to pick up the high ground in working environment arrangements including matters, for example, pay and advancement (2005). They refer to an ongoing blame of Harvard President, Larry Summers, who was legitimately assaulted for recommending that men are better than ladies in science as his method of reasoning for inclining toward men to ladies in the field of science. For some odd reason, the issue isn’t free discourse. President Summers is allowed to offer his sentiment.

Monday, July 13, 2020

How Immersion Journalism Pushes Me To Be a Better Writer

How Immersion Journalism Pushes Me To Be a Better Writer The first book-length work of immersion journalism I can remember reading is Susan Orleans  The Orchid Thief.   You might know it because it was later adapted into the delightfully quirky Spike Jonze / Charlie Kaufman film  Adaptation, starring Nicholas Cage. But while the film is an exploration of writers block and the creative process via GIPHY the book upon which it is based is an examination of a man obsessed with a rare ghost orchid, and of the  flower-selling subculture he became a part of. When I first read the book, I was envious of Orleans subject, who cared more fully about something than I ever had. And I was envious of Orlean because, for a time, she was able to become a part of that world. I read  the book over and over again, unable to get enough of the story, the writing, the technique. From that point on, I couldnt get enough of immersion journalism. I pored through the anthology that first introduced me to Orleanâ€"a collection of interviews with various journalists on their processâ€"and I worked my way through some of their books, including Ted Conovers Newjack  and Jon Krakauers well basically anything by Jon Krakauer. I read longform pieces in the same genre, in  GQ  and  Esquire  and  Vice. It was a form of nonfiction writing I admired, and a form I wished I could write myself. But such writing requires large commitments of time, and I couldnt see how Iâ€"with a husband and a toddler and a home to attend to, making barely enough money to pay my portion of the billsâ€"could ever, logistically, escape into someone elses life. So I continued to exploit my child for money on a mommy site and I continued to write personal essays and I continued to write listicles about orgasms and libido because that is what I do. As I read more immersion journalism, however, over the course of the next 10 or so years, I saw my writing shift. I began looking outward rather than inward. I began inching closer to the type of writing I most revered. Late last year, Ted Conover published a how-to book for budding immersion journalists called, fittingly enough, Immersion.  When I read it, I felt that familiar longing to create something much bigger than myself to  experience  something much bigger than myself. And while I still find myself tethered to a home office, to a toddler, and to a handful of regular writing and editing gigs, I do  what I can. I may not be in a place in my life where I can travel the country with Cirque du Soleil or go through a sex educator training or follow the thread of a persons life for months upon months upon months. But I can add books like  The Crossing  or  Cork Dork  to my TBR. I can spend an afternoon reading  Without You, There Is No Us. I can learn about other cultures through a book like  Gang Leader for a Day. And I can learn, by osmosis at least, how best to reveal other truths. How best to place spotlights upon them. Some of these lessons in technique eventually  find their way into how I approach my own writing. Some of themâ€"and this is no small thingâ€"just make for some damn fine reading. Sign up for True Story to receive nonfiction news, new releases, and must-read forthcoming titles. Thank you for signing up! Keep an eye on your inbox.

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

The Matter The Queen V Bayley Essay - 1572 Words

1. Introduction The purpose of this report is to discuss the matter The Queen V Bayley, which took place on the 29th of September 2012. Adrian bailey (serial rapist) was found guilty on charges of murder and rape, this report will discuss in detail the court proceedings that lead up to the imprisonment of Adrian Bayley and also the events prior to the kidnapping of Jill Meagher. The purpose of this report is to discuss the purpose of law in our society and how it applies to people who commit crimes in our community. As well as the purpose of criminal law in our community. 1.1 Case Information Adrian Ernest Bayley V The Queen Case name - The Queen v Adrian Ernest Bayley Defendant - Adrian Bayley Plea - Guilty Prosecution Agency Team - Victorian Legal Aid. Offences – Murder, as stated in section 3 of the Crimes Act 1958, and Common law. In addiction to this Bayley was convicted by the supreme court of Australia to the charged of rape in relation with section 38 of the crimes act 1958. (Supreme Court of Victoria, 2013) 1.2 History Adrian Ernest Matthew Edwards more commonly know as a Adrian Bayley was born on the 14th July 1971. His criminal profile began in 1990 when he was arrested and charged when he held a teenage girl hostage in his home, and ultimately raped her. In August 1990 Bayley was then charged with attempted rape after attacking a 17 year old girl at a bus stop, the victim identified him to police. In December 1990 Bayle was then arrested and chargedShow MoreRelatedExpo5600 Words   |  23 Pagesfor casting the guilt for Duncan s murder on the 6 SYDNEY STUDIES drugged grooms, both he and she know that they will not be believed: Who dares receive it otherwise? They won t get away with it, but by then they will be King and Queen, and who will then dare accuse them of murder? In the end, we can probably say no more than that Macbeth and Lady Macbeth convince themselves that they will get from the crown what they would have had if they had come by it legitimately. They dare

Candide Free Essays

While reading Voltaire’s Candide, I sensed a touch of detachment on the part of the narrator regarding the violence occurring in the book. He began the story by short, hardly imaginative descriptions of the characters, ending the 1st chapter with an account of the brief lover’s tryst between Candide and Miss Cunegonde which was perturbed by the latter’s father having a fit and without seeming ado, deals Candide with some â€Å"kicks on the breech†, and driving him out the door. This then makes Cunegonde faint but when the girl wakes up, she is met with a boxing of her ears by her mother. We will write a custom essay sample on Candide or any similar topic only for you Order Now The recounting was fast-paced so much so that by the end of the chapter, I felt as though the master of the castle had shut the door to my face also: after such fleeting events—fleeting descriptions, fleeting meetings, fleeting allusions to the depth of the characters’ relationships with each other (or rather, shallowness thereof)—the author ends without so much as a description of how the people felt. We are not given an insight as to how Candide felt about being abruptly separated from his beloved, or how all their love came to be in the first place, although regarding the former, Candide is shown to not have fought for his love nor his home and went about all wretched, for god knows how long, before he naively gets recruited into ranks of the enemy. He then proceeds with another curt account of Candide’s subsequent inclusion into the Bulgarian army, and how, merely because he chose to take a leisurely walk that soldiers (or â€Å"heroes†) were apparently supposed, he was made to run the gauntlet after choosing that over being shot in the head. The atrocity of the actions are rendered impotent to the reader because Voltaire treated them with such a detached air of someone who is merely observing events. Then again a normal observer would not be as indifferent as he was. To an extent, his description of the events became a cruel comedy: the naivete and foolishness of the â€Å"young metaphysician†, a phrase so obviously paradoxical; and, the apparent lack of political and moral judgment on the part of the Bulgarians prior to killing someone who merely took a walk when he was not supposed to, or in other words, the lack of hesitation to commit unjust execution, which might as well be murder. This attitude towards the characters—like that of a cruel god who plays with his own creations/followers like a mean child—continues throughout the first 15 chapters my most favorite being the part where the cowardly Candide makes his way around heaps of dead or dying people, and sees the victims of war: Voltaire gives me the impression that he has a fascination for the morbid, the gruesome, and the morally offensive. No, I do not share this â€Å"fascination†, I just meant to say that it was in this Chapter that Voltaire appeared less indifferent. He gives little value to the emotions and thoughts of his characters, but he has an eye for detail of the surroundings. Personally I find the narration quite humorous, the characters are rendered absurd, the punishments for their absurdity severe and exaggerated. As I said earlier, it is a cruel comedy, full of wit and an undercurrent of intellectual criticism perhaps of the society in which Candide dwelt. However, I also find it morally offensive, as if it were real life and not just a satirical account of a foolish boy, the characters, what with the atrocities, cruelties and hardships they were put through, were treated in an inhumane manner by the narrator: there is a lack of compassion on his part, a quality which I think necessary in this story. Or at least to prove that the narrator has a piece of humanity in him. The lackluster account of the events; the focus on the gruesome and the morbid— all of these leave an air of innate cruelty, of cynicism, of paganism or atheism, of blasphemy, and deep hatred of the lives the characters had. I am given the impression that the author wishes to enlighten us on the perspective of men who care less for others and more for themselves—indifferent of other’s suffering, or if they harbor any feeling, it is that of sheer cruel amusement. How to cite Candide, Papers

Friday, April 24, 2020

The Fountainhead and Dead Poets Society Essay Example For Students

The Fountainhead and Dead Poets Society Essay Qualifications of a Proud Man Pride, then, seems to be a sort of crown of the virtues; for It makes them greater, and it is not found without them. Therefore It Is hard to be truly proud; for It is Impossible without nobility and goodness of character (ARISTOTLE) writes Aristotle In chapter 3 of his Melancholy Ethics. In this excerpt, Aristotle describes the pride and characteristics of a proud man or great-soulless man. Considering the characters of Howard Roars and John Keating, the two seem to be exemplary examples of Aristotle proud man. Although different in many ways, these two men qualify greatly for the ole of a proud man because of their similar basic beliefs of not aiming at things commonly held in honor, to ask for nothing but to give help readily, and to believe that life should be worth living. To begin, Aristotle states that it is characteristic of the proud man not to aim at the things commonly held in honor, or the things in which others excel. Both characters, John Keating and Howard Roars display this characteristic in their lives. Howard Roars Is an architect known for buildings that suggest his personality. We will write a custom essay on The Fountainhead and Dead Poets Society specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now His designs are always Innovative and ascetic, a style In which others do not succeed or agree with. Roars faces criticism against every design he submits but never does this stop him. He will never compromise his principles to please someone else. TLS Is a grand display of his escalates to Aristotle proud man. To continue, John Keating in the Dead Poets Society is a man who also does not aim at things commonly held in honor. Through the lessons in his class, Keating teaches his students the importance of being unique and to not fall into conformity. To get his students to understand this idea, he proclaimed Now we all have a great need for acceptance but you must trust that your beliefs are unique, your own, even Hough others may think them to be odd or unpopular. This statement is a great example of how Mr.. Keating qualifies as an example of the proud man. Overall, through the similarities In striving to be unique and characteristic of independence, Howard Roars and John Keating are both outstanding examples of Aristotle proud man. Next, Aristotle states that It Is a mark of a proud man to ask for nothing or scarcely anything, but to give help readily. Both men share this mark as It greatly describes the generous personalities of Roars and Keating. Roars is very passionate towards his work and he loves doing it. This passion along with great generosity led Roars to hand his designs over to Peter Keating, a fellow architect, without asking for a single thing in return. He is a man who always helps as long as his principles and beliefs are not compromised. Mr.. John Keating is also a man who is very passionate about his work. When a student walks into Seatings quaint room, he asks noon can go anywhere. You can do anything. How can you stand being here? Keating simply replies with Because I love teaching. I do not want to be anywhere else. This dialogue exemplifies Settings sheer desire to teach and help his students even If he test nothing In return. In all, the two men desire to give help and do what they love without asking for anything In return. This Is a strong trait that a proud man possesses. Lastly, a proud man believes that life should be worth living. Aristotle says when he is in danger he is unsparing with his life, knowing there are conditions in know how to live their life to the fullest or not live it at all. When Roars discovered his designs were changed, he risked his life to blow up the building because to him that was a condition in which life was not worth having. Mr.. Keating on the other hand seed one of his students to read an excerpt to the class in order to express his feelings on life. .u8ac8365c88098fedf93872db64e839df , .u8ac8365c88098fedf93872db64e839df .postImageUrl , .u8ac8365c88098fedf93872db64e839df .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u8ac8365c88098fedf93872db64e839df , .u8ac8365c88098fedf93872db64e839df:hover , .u8ac8365c88098fedf93872db64e839df:visited , .u8ac8365c88098fedf93872db64e839df:active { border:0!important; } .u8ac8365c88098fedf93872db64e839df .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u8ac8365c88098fedf93872db64e839df { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u8ac8365c88098fedf93872db64e839df:active , .u8ac8365c88098fedf93872db64e839df:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u8ac8365c88098fedf93872db64e839df .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u8ac8365c88098fedf93872db64e839df .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u8ac8365c88098fedf93872db64e839df .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u8ac8365c88098fedf93872db64e839df .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u8ac8365c88098fedf93872db64e839df:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u8ac8365c88098fedf93872db64e839df .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u8ac8365c88098fedf93872db64e839df .u8ac8365c88098fedf93872db64e839df-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u8ac8365c88098fedf93872db64e839df:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: A Poets History EssayThe excerpt read, To put to route all that was not life; and not, when I had come to die, discover I had not lived. Keating stressed to his students the importance of living your life to the fullest. He taught them that if they arent doing what they love to do then life wasnt worth living. Neil Perry, a student of Mr.. Keating, took this lesson to heart and took his own life when his father forbid him from doing what he loved. He felt that his life should not be lived if he could not pursue his love or acting. Concluding, by doing what he loved, Mr.. Keating taught the boys to do what they love in their life and to seize the day. Howard Roars risked his own life because he couldnt live if his principles were going to be compromised. Overall, Roars and Keating are extraordinary characters of a proud man in the way that they live their life to the fullest potential. To conclude, pride is concerned with honor on the grand scale, as has been said by Aristotle. Howard Roars and John Keating qualify as examples to be Aristotle proud man or great-soulless man because of their undeniably similar characteristics.