Minority Rights - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 6 Words: 1928 Downloads: 7 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Law Essay Type Review Did you like this example? Minority Rights QUESTION 1: Minority Rights and Entrenchment in Statutory and Constitutional Instruments The British North America (BNA) Act of 1867, among other things, guaranteed some set of minority rights for the Canadian minority groups. This section highlights the rights, their effectiveness, and factors that contributed towards the statutory establishment of the rights in the CBR 1960 as well as Constitutional entrenchment in 1982. The paper also explores some of the entrenchment rights and how they have proved useful in limiting government actions against the minority rights. The Minority Rights and Their Effectiveness The BNA Act 1867 had a few rights that sought to protect the Canadian minority. One such right was language rights. Section 133 provided that members of the legislature in the Quebec national assembly had a right to use either English or French. Consequently, any legislative records emanating from the legislature of the provin ce or affecting the province had to be produced in both the languages. It also guaranteed the citizens in the province the right to use either of the languages before a court in Quebec or Canadian federal court, whether in respect to pleadings or other court procedures such as hearings. As of the time the Act was enacted, majority of the Canadian were English speaking with the French speakers being minority. French speakers were mainly found in the Quebec. By guaranteeing the right to use French, the statute sought to protect a minority who had the difficulty to use the English language. This right, however, proved not to be a very effective mechanism for protecting minority language rights for various reasons. First, while providing for bilingualism in Quebec parliament, not all the members of parliament were French speakers. In fact, the English speakers constituted majority. The English speakers could not understand their French counterparts if they spoke in French and vice versa . In effect, the French speakers still had to learn English, and possibly use it in legislative debates of crucial interest, otherwise fail to effectively communicate. Second, the BNA Act did not bind the legislature to observe the use of French; neither did it declare bilingualism an official position. In effect, it was difficult to compel the executive to use French when dealing with the French minority. The French Canadians therefore failed to get effective legal protection due to the challenges highlighted. Another crucial right was the educational rights of the religious minorities. Pursuant to section 93 of the BNA Act 1867, every province reserved a prerogative to make laws on its education policy, but such policies could not be prejudicial to the Denominational Schools. Essentially, these were confessional rights that sought to protect faith of individuals. This provision was sufficiently adequate to protect the minority religious groups, as it bound the state not to impo se education policies that could jeopardize religious development though imposition of language that would make religious advancement difficult to contain. The French Catholic Canadians utilized this section as linguistic and cultural refuge though setting up confessional schools. The right however, proved to be of limited effectiveness in protecting the French minority as a whole, because it could only be exercised in the context of education and had to relate with confessional matters. Overall, the protection shields the minority religious groups from legislative actions in education that may infringe the religious rights of such a group. Minority rights in the CBR in 1960 and constitutional entrenchment in 1982 There were a number of limitations with the minority rights protection regime that necessitated passing of the Canadian Bill of Rights (BNA) in 1960, and subsequent entrenchment of such rights in the Canadian Constitution. First, the minority rights were limited in s cope and, in some cases, geographical application. For instance, the use of French and English for official purposes was limited to Quebec .Even then it failed to commit the executive to observe it. There was, thus a need to extend the scope of the protection and to facilitate enjoyment of such rights all though Canada. Secondly, the courts had limited powers to enforce them, as they had to restrict themselves to the traditional remedies available. The Bill and Charter subsequently sought to expand the scope of remedies beyond the common law powers that would be available, especially under judicial review. Finally, the courts were often narrowly interpreted, even if they breached the minority rights. Entrenching the rights into the Canadian Constitution (Charter) implied superiority over the laws passed by the legislature, therefore guaranteeing greater protection. The Charter protected wide range of minority rights, either directly or indirectly. Through section 16, the Charter introduced Official bilingualism declaring both French and English Canadian Official language. This extended protection of the French speaking minority across Canada, rather than just Quebec as had been the case under BNA Act 1867. It also impliedly committed all Canadian institutions to observe bilingualism. Section 23 of the Charter guaranteed the right to have certain English or French-speaking minority to use their own language as the education medium. Section 25 further acknowledged Aboriginal rights, by expressly stating that it did not derogate any of the preexisting rights. Among such rights included treaty rights and other rights specified in section 35 of the 1982 of the Constitution Act such as aboriginal land right claims. Section 29 preserved religious schools, thus extending protection to religious minorities. In so far as the rights are constitutionally entrenched, the Charter proves an effective way to protect the rights as the courts will invalidate any law or polic y that infringes the constitutional protections. This follows affirmation of the supremacy of the charter under section 52. A major setback, however, is that the rights are subject to limitation clause, which entitles the government to limit the rights if the limitation is justifiable. The state has hardly abused the clause in the context of minority rights. In other in cases it has been used, it has always been justified on the grounds of public policy such as obscenity (like in R. v. Butler) and hate speech (such as R. v. Keegstra). QUESTION 2: The Charter and Constitution Act, 1982 provides wide range of remedies available to individuals in the event that an entity infringes the rights of the person enshrined in the Act. The remedies are arguably effective as they include and go beyond the traditional rules of remedies available at common law. This is because section 24 gives the courts reserve a broad prerogative to decide on what remedies provide as long as they are just and reasonable (Hogg, 2002). The room left for creative application of the remedies makes it more likely that the courts will deliver most suitable remedies without being barred by origin legal requirements. Some of the remedies, as they apply against the government’s breach of rights, are discussed below. Injunction This is an order from the court, compelling the party against who it is ordered, to stop further illegality. In the context of the charter, it would be an order compelling the government to stop any further breach of an individual’s Charter rights. An innovative application of injunction is to be found in the case of Doucet-Boudreau v Nova Scotia (Minister of Education) (2003) in which the appellant sought a declaration under section 24(1) of the charter that delayed set up of French language schools breached their Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms’ rights as provided under section 23. The trial court agreed that it amount to infringemen t and ordered the Nova Scottish Minister of education to cease further breach by expediting completion of the building. The Canadian Supreme Court agreed with the Novia Scottish Supreme Court that the delay infringed on the appellant’s minority language educational rights and upheld the direction of the trial court that the ministry of education keeps reporting the progress. Injunction can effectively be used to bring to a stop continued infringement of charter rights. It cannot, however, be used to quash an order or a directive already given. An Order of Certiorari An order of certiorari is a judicial review remedy that may be used to invalidate an order, directive or official publication issued by a public officer if there are procedural or substantive flaws (Hogg, 2002). In the context of the Charter, it may be used where the government proceeds to issue an order or directive or a policy guideline that infringes the charter rights, or does not comply with charter req uirements. For instance, a ministerial directive requiring eviction of the aboriginals can be quashed through issuance of a certiorari, as such order would be infringing on the aboriginal land claims and rights, thus in breach of section 25 of the Charter rights. Declaration Order Section 52 of the Charter acknowledges its supremacy in relation to other sources of law, and affirms a nullity and invalidity of any law that contravenes the Charter. This section can be relied upon by a litigant to seek an order from the court declaring that a law passed by the provincial or federal; legislators are of no effect or force for being inconsistent with the Charter. A case in point in Osborne v. Canada (Treasury Board) (1991) where the respondents sought to challenge s. 33(1) of the Public Service Employment Act for being unconstitutional and therefore invalid. The said section prohibited those serving as public servants from taking part in any political meeting or making contributions to a political party or a political candidate. Al the respondents were of the view that such a section infringed on section 2(a) and (d) of the Charter Rights to freedom of expression and political association respectively. They therefore sought a declaration of nullity on the grounds of constitutionality. The trial court took the view that the limitation, though infringing the charter rights, was justifiable under section 1 of the charter. Thus, it remained valid. However, the Court of Appeal, the Federal; Court of Appeal revered the decision, holding that the sections unjustifiably restricted the charter rights and therefore invalid. Exclusion of Evidence A person facing any trial may apply for exclusion of incriminating evidence under section 24(2) on the grounds that it infringes the individual’s crater rights. The Canadian Courts have taken a view that such a remedy (exclusion of illegally obtained evidence) will be granted if the manner the evidence was collected brings justice into disrepute. A case in point is in R VS Grant (2009) in which the Court of Appeal for Ontario declared bang and firearms adduced before the court inadmissible because the accused section 9 and 10 of charter rights were infringed., There were no reasonable grounds to detain him as required by section 89 nor was he accorded a right to counsel pursuant to Article 10. Stay of Proceedings In criminal trials, where an individual claims that a constitutional right has been infringed, the individual may apply to the court to stay the proceedings pending determination of whether the Charter rights were infringed. This remedy will particularly arise where the court in which the accused is tried has no competent jurisdiction to determine the infringement of the charter rights. This right was affirmed in R. v. Mills (1986) , where the Court of Appeal held the view that the accused right to stay of proceedings pending determination of breach of Charter rights extended to the preliminary inquiry because in the long run the judge will not be able to impose any legal penalty if a charter right was infringed. References Doucet-Boudreau v Nova Scotia (Minister of Education) (2003) 3 S.C.R. 3 Hogg, P.W. (2002).Constitutional law of Canada, 4th ed., Cars well: Scarborough Osborne v. Canada (Treasury Board) [1991] 2 S.C.R. 69 R. v. Grant, 2009 SCC 32, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 353 R. v. Mills (1986) [1986] 1 S.C.R. 863, [1986] S.C.J. No. 39 The British North America (BNA) Act of 1867 The Charter and Constitution Act, 1982 Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Minority Rights" essay for you Create order

The Characters of Portia and Calphurnia in Shakespeares...

The Characters of Portia and Calphurnia in Shakespeares Julius Caesar For thousands of years, humanity has been ruled mainly by a Patriarchal society. In this society women have often been seen as objects or inferior humans through the eyes of their male counterparts. The Elizabethan era was no exception to these beliefs, and works of literature often supported these misogynistic views. In Shakespeares Julius Caesar, however, the author appears to portray the characters of Portia and Calphurnia in a positive light, ignoring the common stereotypes often associated with female characters. Although Portia and Calphurnia have minor parts in the play, their strength is discernible. Both female characters are portrayed as†¦show more content†¦She tries to convince Brutus into divulging his secret by invoking the vows of love they made to each other, and also by begging him on her knees. Brutus shows his respect for Portia by stating, Kneel not, gentle Portia, (II, I, 300). When Brutus lifts Portia off of her knees to face him, this reve als Brutus admiration for his wife. Despite Brutus respect for his wife, he still continues to withhold his secret. Portia once again declares that as his wife she deserves Brutus respect and adoration: But, as it were, in sort or limitation, To keep with you at meals, comfort your bed, /And talk to you sometimes? Dwell I but in the suburbs/Of your good pleasure? If it be no more, /Portia is Brutuss harlot, not his wife, (II, I, 305-310). Portia is describing to Brutus that by excluding her from his secret, that she has been reduced to his concubine. Brutus responds to Portias statement by stating, You are my true and honorable wife, /As dear to me as are the ruddy drops/That visit my sad heart,(II, I, 311-313). Brutus shows that despite, his depressed state, he still loves and cares for his wife showing the mutual relationship Brutus and Portia share that is based on love. Portia still tries to uncover the cause of Brutus sorrow, and proves she is worthy of keeping a secret because of her nobleness. First she states, I grant I am a woman, but withal/A woman that Lord Brutus took to wife. /I grant I am a woman, butShow MoreRelatedAn Analysis Of Taming Of The Shrew 2561 Words   |  11 PagesDeshal Desai Professor: Thomas Gilligan EN 358 7 August 2016 Characteristic of Women’s Taming of the Shrew: KATHERINE Negative Characteristics: Katherine is the title character (the â€Å"Shrew†) of the play. She is the eldest and unmarried daughter of Baptista. She is hot tempered and can slap people around her when they make her mad. Katherine Minola is a fiery, spirited women and seeing her such behavior, the people around her doesn’t quite know how to react with her or what to do with her. MostRead MoreJulius Caesar as the Noblest Roman of Them All Essay686 Words   |  3 PagesJulius Caesar as the Noblest Roman of Them All In William Shakespeares Julius Caesar the victorious Mark Antony calls his rival Brutus, the noblest Roman of them all. At the start of the play we witnessed Cassius persuade Brutus to join a conspiracy to kill Caesar. In my essay I intend to discuss four main characters in order to prove or disapprove Mark Antonys statement. The play starts off with Julius Caesar entering Rome after his victory in the civilRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Julius Caesar Essay1833 Words   |  8 Pages INTRODUCTION The seemingly straightforward simplicity of â€Å"Julius Caesar† has made it a perennial favourite for almost 400 years. Despite its simplicity, almost Roman in nature, the play is rich both dramatically and thematically, and every generation since Shakespeare’s time has been able to identify with some political aspect of the play. The Victorians found a stoic, sympathetic character in Brutus and found Caesar unforgivably weak and tyrannical. As we move into the twenty-first century, audiences

Relevance Of Kant’s Ideas In Today’s Modern World Free Essays

In his Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant formulated his theory of the Universal Law, which states that a person must act according to the maxim that he or she can will to become a universal law. Simply put, that maxim behind one’s behavior must be a principle that any other individual can apply, something that one â€Å"can rationally will that everyone adopt† (Van der Linden). Under this Kantian law, the very notion of harming one’s future self becomes a preposterous, if not criminal, idea because one cannot obviously will everybody to follow suit. We will write a custom essay sample on Relevance Of Kant’s Ideas In Today’s Modern World or any similar topic only for you Order Now The believe that in a government working its way towards the equality of its citizens. Freedom, for Kant, is obtained through a universal theory of right. Morality is at the center of Kant’s freedom and this is crucial in forming a government. John got his freedom, through murdering the tyrant. And in this case, the freedom and the rights of the rich man, tyrant as he is, was stepped upon proving the unrighteousness of the action. Kant values the sense of freedom in relation to reason. If man is fated or causally determined, then it is pointless for freedom to exist as man has already a determined course of actions. John earned the trust of the people by recognizing the general will of the community, or what is known as the people’s will. Acknowledging the general will creates the laws of the society. These laws, however, should be grounded by the good of the people. Only with the consent of the people will the laws and, ultimately, the government will turn to be legitimate. Kant defines the ideal government in such a way that morality is at the center of it. And with this notion, the actions of John were not justifiable. John’s government started out with a wrong foot, his concealment of the murder of the tyrant. Although this brought about the freedom of the people, the method of doing so was immoral in Kant’s views. This is the kind of society that is ideally set up. The theme of Kant’s moral philosophy is on how people deserve to be happy and not happiness in itself. This is prevalent in the teachings of John gave away the tyrant’s wealth to the people because they deserve to be happy. The morality of man’s actions does not depend on the outcome of the actions. However, we can control the reason behind the action. The morality then rests upon the motivation behind the action. But a motivation of a positive goal, such as making people happy or benefiting the people the same way as John did, is not the right motive, according to Kant. â€Å"No outcome, should we achieve it, can be unconditionally good. Fortune can be misused, by what we thought would induce benefit that might actually bring harm, and happiness might be undeserved. [†¦] It is the possession of a rationally guided will that adds a moral dimension to one’s acts. So it is the recognition and appreciation of duty itself that must drive our actions† (McCormick 2001). Morality of one’s actions is defined by pursuing a goal with no conditions. The reason is not the means for the ends. â€Å"All means to an end have a merely conditional worth because they are valuable only for achieving something else† (McCormick 2001). Thus, John’s actions were not morally right. He used immoral ways in achieving his goal. And this could also be used in performing other actions leading to harm of other people. Kant stresses that the moral worth of an action is not based on its effects, or on anything else publicly visible about it, but rather on why the agent performed it. Kant believes that the highest good requires both our moral perfection and our well being proportionate to our moral perfection, but we are not capable of bringing about either of those. It is in God that ultimate happiness commensurable to goodness can be experienced. Goodness and happiness can only be reached through actions towards morality, a maxim of duty that disregards the conditions. How to cite Relevance Of Kant’s Ideas In Today’s Modern World, Papers

MEDIA, CULTURE AND SOCIETY Essay Example For Students

MEDIA, CULTURE AND SOCIETY Essay -THE NEWS MEDIAHorror movie right there on my TVShocking me right out of my brainsHorror movie, its the six thirty News. The Skyhooks. The news media is in our face each and everyday with immaculate women and fatherly men bringing us up to date around the clock. I am, of course, specifically talking about television news, however, much of what I will say is true for radio and print news as well. But what is news? Stuart Hall, 1978 quotes:At any given moment billions of simultaneous events occur throughout the worldAll of these occurrences are potentially news. They do not become so until some purveyor of news gives an account of them. The news is the account of an event, not something instringic in the event itself. When considering the social production of news we should also discuss what is thought to be newsworthy. By looking at headline news stories we can see that they contain elements of drama and intrigue. In this paper I will look specifically at the three commercial evening news programs in South Australia seen on channels 7, 9 and 10. In looking closely at the social production of news in South Australia I will reflect on the connections drawn between the news media, cultural meanings and everyday social life. As the quote in the first paragraph says, billions of events happen around the world everyday. What we are considering are the elements that make an event newsworthy, meaning the event is of enough interest to enough people to keep the audience watching and thus the companies buying their advertising time. News programs face problems of regularly producing and distributing a commodity that is both irregular and unpredictable. The production is governed by deadlines and what is referred to as the news hole which is the twenty two minutes each night that needs to be filled with news. So whether war breaks out or a cat gets stuck up a tree, whether it is a light news day or a heavy one the twenty two minutes gets filled nothing more nothing less. (Tiffen, R. 1989)We need to keep in mind that it is imperative that commercial news programs appeal to populist views. To keep selling advertising spaces at top dollar the news programs need to keep up the ratings. This in turn explains why com mercial news programs report events that will be of interest to the majority and never concentrate on stories which are relevant or interesting to a minority group only. Journalists render stories as newsworthy to fill the news hole, to fit the deadlines and appeal to the majority to keep ratings. There is also a whole set of news values which constitute good news. The most primary value is that the story is out of the ordinary, stories which in some way breach our normal expectations about social life.(Hall et al. 1978) Extraordinariness, however, is not the only news value in making good news. Other news values include events that happen to the elite and famous personalities, events which are dramatic or show human characteristics of humour, sadness or sentimentality etc. and events which have a negative consequence or events which are part of an existing newsworthy theme. Perennial themes such as football, the Melbourne Cup or Christmas find a regular place as good news. Also local news is considered very important and often stories will headline specifically because of their local content. (Hall et al. 1978)Before writing this paper I viewed all three commercial evening news programs in South Australia from Tuesday the 29th of October, I took notes on the type of events each station thought to be newsworthy. Sure enough the previously mentioned news values were evident in South Australian commercial news. All three news programs had approximately the same format, roughly eight important and short stories then an ad break, four or five global and general interest stories then another ad break followed by sport, ads and weather to conclude. Channel Ten was slightly different as it is an hour long, it included a recap on major stories and more general interest stories. At this stage I will look at the stories that are reported before the first ad break as these are considered to be the most newsworthy. It is clear to see just how well local stories rate if we look at the opening stories on each news program. Eight out of the ten opening stories on channel Nine were South Australian. The only national stories to come before the ad break were a murder case in Victoria and an increase in wages for the Coles Myer chief. Channel Seven was slightly more balanced with four national stories and four South Australian stories. However, it was interesting to see that channel Seven only reported one international story in the entire program. Channel Ten had six South Australian stories out of seven. It seems that South Australians only wish to hear about South Australians, even if this means hearing about the Christmas pageant before a fatal building collapse in Cairo, as we did on channel Nine. GAY MARRIAGES EssayTelevision news is, no doubt, dominated by visual aesthetics, what looks good is interesting and pleasing to watch. The visual back up of each story confirms it validity making television a trustworthy source of information. Every story in my observation contained pictures from both the event and/or the channel library. It has been said that if a story doesnt carry footage it is not considered newsworthy and may not run at all. This visual style of television news is typically American and is quite different to the traditional English style. In the 1950s the BBC had no moving pictures with their news coverage at all. It was simply the radio news played over a picture of the Big Ben. (Henningham, 1988)For communication to be possible you need a speaker and a listener to interact. We know a lot about news readers but what do they know about us? How do they view their viewers?It is said that journalists know little about their audience, partly because they dont have access to the information. Their opinion of their audience is low, deriving this opinion mainly from the people who call in to the show. One journalist said If the station callers are representative of their whole audience them we are all in big trouble. (Henningham, 1988)Television news is the most trusted form of news today. Yet most of us know we dont always get the whole truth and nothing but the truth. News programs are made in tight deadlines and the news hole has to be filled no matter what happened during the day. Journalists will organise programs by following news values to decide what stories are newsworthy. This is why Adelaide commercial news usually contains a great deal of local content, stories of drama, emotion and negativity, personalities, perennial themes, populist views and of course visuals, visuals, visuals. While television news has the facade of an honest and reliable form of news media it is quite clearly shows a misrepresentation of everyday social life, thus creating meaning and myth in our culture.